How should the actual relative location of a corner be reported?

The most suitable method for reporting the actual relative location of a corner in surveying contexts is through positional tolerance. This term refers to the acceptable range within which the location of the corner can vary based on various factors such as measurement error, instrument accuracy, and the precision with which the corner was established. By defining a positional tolerance, surveyors can communicate the reliability and limitations of the corner's location, allowing for a clear understanding of how closely the actual position corresponds to the intended position.

This approach is critical in land surveying because it acknowledges that no measurement is perfect, and it provides a framework for evaluating the effectiveness of the surveying process. It ensures that any discrepancies are documented and understood by all parties involved, thereby reducing the potential for disputes over property boundaries and making it easier to work with adjacent property owners or authorities.

Other options, such as positional location, relative distance, and geographic coordinates, do not specifically address the inherent uncertainties associated with measured positions. While they provide useful information, they do not convey the concept of variation or tolerance, which is essential in accurately representing the reliability of corner locations in surveying practice.