What assumption is made about a surveyor's actions in the case of Muldoon V. Sternberg?

In the case of Muldoon v. Sternberg, the assumption made about the surveyor's actions is that the surveyor followed his field notes to all lines. This indicates that the surveyor was diligent in adhering to documented measurements and observations recorded during the surveying process. Following field notes is crucial in legal disputes, as it demonstrates that the surveyor maintained a standard of care and professionalism in conducting the survey, thereby supporting the integrity and accuracy of their work.

The emphasis on field notes is important in legal contexts because they serve as a vital record of the surveyor's methodology, findings, and decisions that were made in the field. These notes are often scrutinized when assessing the quality and thoroughness of the surveyor's work, particularly in situations where boundaries might be contested or clarity is needed.

In contrast, other choices suggest less rigorous survey practices, such as only visiting key points of concern or relying solely on digital mapping, which may not adequately capture the complete scope of the surveying task. Furthermore, the option regarding not marking any boundaries implies a lack of action necessary for establishing definitive property lines, which is not aligned with the expectation of thoroughness implied in the case. Therefore, adhering to field notes embodies the standard approach expected from a professional