What is a key consideration in the case of State vs Palacios regarding boundary determination?

In the case of State vs Palacios, a crucial consideration for boundary determination is the surveyor's actions in locating boundaries. This focus reflects the importance of how a surveyor conducts their work in the field, interpreting and implementing legal descriptions and physical markers.

Surveying involves not only the application of technical skills but also decision-making during boundary location, where surveyors must consider various elements such as natural landmarks, previously established boundary lines, and any existing legal documents. The manner in which these boundaries are physically marked and the judgment exercised in this process can heavily influence disputes over property lines.

By emphasizing the actions taken by the surveyor, the court can assess whether these actions align with established surveying practices and the intent behind legal boundary descriptions. This involves evaluating the methods used, the respect for existing boundaries, and adherence to the relevant surveying standards, which all contribute to the conclusion reached by the court regarding property rights.

Other factors, such as the surveyor's written intentions, difficulties faced during the survey, or historical regulations, while relevant in some contexts, do not provide the same clarity and relevance in this specific case's outcome as the surveyor's direct actions do.