What law pertains to the use of navigable waterways in the Diversion Lake Club V. Heath case?

In the Diversion Lake Club v. Heath case, the Gradient Boundary law is the key aspect because it deals with the ownership and rights related to navigable waterways and the land adjacent to them. This law dictates that a property owner has rights to the land up to the edge of navigable waters, known as the gradient boundary, which affects land usage, access, and property ownership rights associated with water bodies.

The Gradient Boundary law ensures that landowners understand their rights regarding both the land bordering these waterways and any related usage. This principle is particularly relevant in issues concerning access and the extent of ownership, which can come into play with disputes over use of the waters and adjacent land, as seen in this case.

The other concepts do have relevance in different contexts but do not encapsulate the primary legal principle at play in this specific case. The Accretion law addresses how land is gradually added through sedimentation, which is more relevant to ownership rights changes over time rather than immediate access to navigable waters. The Stream access law involves rights to access the waterways themselves, but it does not directly relate to ownership boundaries like the Gradient Boundary law. Common law rights refer to rights that emerge from court decisions rather than statutory laws, which may have implications in