What type of evidence is described as 'indirect'?

Indirect evidence refers to information that does not directly support a conclusion but rather provides circumstantial support that can lead to an inference. When evaluating evidence in surveying or legal situations, indirect evidence is typically associated with data or facts that, while not definitive on their own, can be combined with other pieces to form a reasonable conclusion.

For instance, if a survey shows a pattern of land use that suggests a specific boundary, this can be classified as indirect evidence. It does not explicitly state where the boundary lies, but it implies it through context and related observations. This type of evidence plays a crucial role in many surveying discussions, where all available information contributes to understanding property lines or rights, bolstering arguments even when no single piece of evidence provides a straightforward answer.

The other types of evidence, while they serve important roles, do not fit the definition of indirect evidence as it is understood in this context. For example, evidence that clearly points to a conclusion would be considered direct evidence, and documents with official stamps provide authoritative validation rather than inferential support. Expert responses may offer insights or analyses but can fall into direct evidence categories if they provide definitive conclusions.