Which of the following is a clue for potential adverse possession?

The option referencing fences occupying the premises reflects an important criterion for establishing potential adverse possession. In many jurisdictions, including Texas, the presence of a fence can be evidence that a party has exercised control over the land. This physical barrier indicates that the person occupying the land has treated it as their own, which is a fundamental requirement for the claim of adverse possession.

Such a fence suggests a long-term, exclusive use of the property, which is essential for someone trying to claim adverse possession. It can illustrate not only physical occupation but also an intent to possess the land. This occupation must be visible and notorious, meaning that it is clear to anyone that the person is claiming that land as their own.

Other options, while they may relate to property rights or the legal context of ownership, do not directly represent elements that definitively indicate a claim of adverse possession. Regular payment of property taxes is necessary in some cases but is only one aspect and may not be conclusive on its own. Public use of land usually indicates that the land is being utilized in a way that does not support an owner’s claim against the true owner. Maintaining a clear title pertains more to lawful ownership and possession rather than an adverse claim.